We present an application focused on the design of resilient long-reach passive optical networks. We specifically consider dual-parented networks whereby each customer must be connected to two metro sites via local exchange sites. An important property of such a placement is resilience to single metro node failure. The objective of the application is to determine the optimal position of a set of metro nodes such that the total optical fibre length is minimized. We prove that this problem is NP-Complete. We present two alternative combinatorial optimisation approaches to finding an optimal metro node placement using: a mixed integer linear programming (MIP) formulation of the problem; and, a hybrid approach that uses clustering as a preprocessing step. We consider a detailed case-study based on a network for Ireland. The hybrid approach scales well and finds solutions that are close to optimal, with a runtime that is two orders-of-magnitude better than the MIP model.

We report on an emerging application focused on the design of resilient long reach passive optical networks using combinatorial optimisation techniques. The objective of the application is to determine the optimal position and capacity of a set of metro nodes. We specifically consider dual parented networks whereby each customer must be associated with two metro nodes. An important property of such a placement is resilience to single node failure. Therefore excess capacity should be provided at each metro node in order to ensure that customers can be redistributed amongst the metro sites. Our application, as well as finding optimal node placements, can compute the minimum level of excess capacity on all metro nodes. In this paper we present three alternative approaches to optimal metro node placement.We present a detailed analysisof the impact of different placement approaches on the distribution of excess capacity throughout the network. We show that preferential distributions occur in practice, based on a case-study in Ireland. Finally we show that load and excess capacity provision are independent of each other.